Filed under: History, Journalism, Politics | Tags: 3 News, 7 News, ABC, Africa, Al Arabiya, al Jazeera, America, Argentina, Asia, Asian, Associated Press, Aung Sin Suu Kyi, Australia, BBC, Bias, Bild, Brazil, Britain, Buenos Aires Herald, Burma, Calcutta Telegraph, Canada, CBS, China, Chosun Ilbo, CNN, Cyclone Nargis, Der Spiegel, Dubai, El Mundo, El Nacional, El Pais, Europe, Express, Faifax, Folha, Fox, France, France24, Germany, Guardian, Hong Kong, Impartiality, Independent, Independent Newspapers, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Jakarta Post, Japan, Japan Times, Jerusalem Post, Journalism, Journalist, Korea Herald, La Repubblica, La Stampa, Le Monde, Mail and Guardian, Media, Middle East, MSNBC, Myanmar, National Nine News, National Post, Networks, New India Times, New York Times, New Zealand Herald, News, Newspapers, Newsweek, One News, Poeple's Daily, Politics, Qatar, Rangoon, Reuters, Sky News, South Africa, South America, South China Morning Post, South Korea, Spain, Sydney Morning Herald, Telegraph, The Australian, The Star, The Times, Time, Times, Times of India, Toronto Sun, UN, United Kingdom, United Nations, United States of America, USA Today, Vancouver Sun, Venezuela, Washington Post, Washington Times, Websites, West Australian, Xinhua, Yangon
The recent devastation caused by Cyclone Nargis has displaced perhaps over a million and killed tens of thousands. The initial storm flattened villages and sent a tsunami wave crashing over low-lying coastal areas. Waterborne diseases now pose a further threat to those affected. The military dictatorship has hindered relief efforts from across the world, as agencies struggle to get the aid in to the country that is desperately needed.
When will the people of Burma get the assistance they so badly need? Or will the government of Myanmar continue to hinder relief efforts? Continue reading
Filed under: Journalism, Politics | Tags: ABC, Afganistan, al Jazeera, Associated Press, Australian, BBC, Bias, Charlie Reina, CNN, Coalition of the willing, Conflict, Conservative, Dave Marash, Donald Rumsfeld, Fair and balanced, Fox, Fox News, George Bush, Georgetown University, Guardian, Homicide bombers, Impartiality, Iraq, Jihad Ballout, John Pilger, Journalism, Ken Jarecke, Liberal, Media, Middle East, New York Times, North America, Objectivity, Orwell, Osama bin Laden, Outfoxed, Palestine, Politics, Qatar, Republican, Reuters, Riz Khan, Robert Murdoch, Saddam Hussein, Steven Poole, Suicide bombers, Terrorism, Terrorist, Tony Blair, United States, Unspeak, Wadah Khanfar, War, War on Terrorism, Washington Post, Will Stebbins, Zdenek Urbánek
The following article was an assignment for a Public Affairs Reporting paper as part of my graduate diploma in Journalism. It is a commentary on the challenge of maintaining impartiality when reporting on conflict.
The first casualty of war is truth.
Issues of balance and fairness in war reporting
By Paul Harper
Objectivity as a goal has largely been dismissed by journalists as unrealistic, if not impossible. Impartiality, however, is regarded by many to be attainable. It is an ideal that journalists strive for.
But in wartime the game changes. The constraints of commercial interests ensure the packaged news is palatable to their audience and to advertisers. There are things audiences do not want to see and hear. When a nation is at war the media files in behind the troops, another cog in the war machine, patriotically flying flags, they become the cheerleaders repeating the official line.
Impartiality, balance and fairness go out the window. Continue reading